SwapFramework Comparisons
Understand how Swap.Htmx stacks up against popular alternatives.
⚛️
vs React
Client-side SPA vs server-driven simplicity. See when each approach makes sense.
Read comparison →
🔵
vs Blazor
Two .NET approaches to interactive web apps. Compare Server, WebAssembly, and Swap.Htmx.
Read comparison →
🔧
vs Vanilla HTMX
Why use Swap.Htmx instead of plain HTMX? See the developer experience improvements.
Read comparison →
🅰️
vs Angular
Enterprise-grade frameworks compared. Complexity, learning curve, and maintenance.
Read comparison →
Quick Comparison Matrix
| Swap.Htmx | React | Blazor | Angular | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Server-driven | Client SPA | Both | Client SPA |
| Language | C# + HTML | JavaScript/TS | C# | TypeScript |
| JS Bundle Size | ~14kb | 100kb+ | 2MB+ (WASM) | 200kb+ |
| Learning Curve | Low | Medium-High | Medium | High |
| SEO | Excellent | Requires SSR | Good (Server) | Requires SSR |
| Real-time | Built-in SSE | Requires setup | SignalR | Requires setup |
| State Management | Server-side | Client-side | Both | Client-side |